rickshangle.com

March 14, 2007

David Sedaris May Sometimes Exaggerate For Effect - Gawker

Filed under: Books, ignoble ranting — rshangle @ 5:02 pm

David Sedaris May Sometimes Exaggerate For Effect - Gawker

I can grasp the hubub over A Million Little Pieces and this chick, to a degree. Although I haven’t read either one’s work (and probably never will, LIARS!), I doubt either volume features a 20-page forward attempting to convince the reader that every word is the non-embellished truth. But I really don’t know, to be honest. And it’s not the point.

But when Gawker goes after David Sedaris, who is basically a comedian, and I don’t think makes any real pretense that what he’s saying is completely (or even remotely) true, what hope is there for anyone who wants to write anything another human would want to read, given that if we are to “write what we know”, we would only write a series of facts so mundane as to literally and instantly vaporize the reader[1]?

Is the assumption that writing about family/work life implies strict adherence to the truth, and that there shouldn’t be fiction that has vague roots in a “typical” and some might say “boring” everyday situations? If so, I missed that day of… whatever class I didn’t take that would have discussed this topic.

If so, the potential global pool of potential authors would be reduced to Noam Chomsky, and him… only maybe. I’m reading Hegemony or Survival right now, and who else has ever heard of this so-called “Cuban Missle Crisis”? You’re not Tom Clancy, Noam — stick to the facts.

What, you say? Gawker is a highly ironic, metrosexually-oriented “news” site, primarily focused on the discussion of people (like, ehr, David Sedaris) that most of non-metrosexual America has never heard of? And that this exaggerated “outing” of Sedaris’s lies is, itself, meant to be ironic? I might, like Alanis Morrissette, have a problem with the whole irony concept.

[1] There, I exaggerated. Did it kill you?

May 3, 2006

another author takedown.

Filed under: Books, Media — rshangle @ 8:24 am

embellishment.

borrowing.

Oh well - her story about all this will probably make a good book. see some conspiracy theories at althouse (the comments, not the slug).

It makes me slightly concerned re: my current project, since it really only gained momentum after I decided to believe what Stephen King said in On Writing:

NOTE: I DID NOT COME UP WITH THIS IDEA; NOTICE THE QUOTES. I ATTRIBUTE THIS TO STEPHEN KING, BILLIONAIRE AUTHOR OF “THE STAND” and “CARRIE”. ALSO, I’M PARAPHRASING. PARAPHRASING.

“Forget the idea that you are going to say anything that hasn’t been said 1,000 times before, and probably said better.”

NOTE: NOT MY IDEA. REPEAT: NOT MY IDEA

Perhaps the following disclaimer in some sort of preface will help save some time later on:

So maybe we can make this easier for everyone by assuming now that none of it is even remotely true. Or original. In fact, the best thing I can recommend to increase your quality of life is to sell this book and immediately reclaim the future hours you would have spent reading it / getting angry.

The names are lies; the people described herein were actually not even people, but talking dogs. The product models and serial numbers are complete fallacy; there never was a RAID array called the HDS 9981V. As a matter of fact, when I mention that computers only count with 0’s and 1’s — yup, a lie. A terrible, terrible lie with no factual basis whatsoever.

If you do waste your time by working through these pages, you’ll see these references to a type of operating system called “UNIX”, which is clearly a play on words; I mean, who would name an operating system after a guy with no nuts?

Also - I did not come up with that joke; a software instructor I once had did, and for all I know he stole it from someone else. What I’m saying is as far as I know, it was his. See bibliography on page 490, and also Safe Harbor Statement on page 493.

Finally, I did not invent the English language as I claim on page 301; that was a humorous device suffering from a lack of humor.

rds

February 2, 2006

ABR - Top 100 Best First Lines from Novels

Filed under: Books — rshangle @ 3:33 pm

As someone who aspires to write (and who does, just not well), I could do worse by making my way through reading at least 33% of the books on this list.

rds

January 3, 2006

2005 Three Day Novel Contest Outcome Announced!

Filed under: Books, Comedy, Media — rshangle @ 11:20 pm

Let the readers of rickshangle.com blog be the first to know that Eric and I didn’t win (or shortlist) the 2005 Three Day Novel contest with our entry Taketh. No problem. We’ll tackle it again next year.

Excelsior and congratulations to the winners and short-listers! And next year - maybe a non-Canadian winner!

rds

==========

- reprinted without permission. i would set this up as a link to 3DN’s web page if I could find a permalink to the 2005 winners. rds -

Here are the winners and runners-up from our 28th annual literary marathon!

1st Prize (Publication Spring 2006)

DAY SHIFT WEREWOLF
by Jan Underwood

It’s not always easy to scare up a living. Warren the werewolf is on the outs with the union; regulations say they can’t fire him, but they can demote him to a very undesirable shift. Is it the end of Warren’s career, or a chance to muzzle out his true identity? Day Shift Werewolf  is about the underdogs of the horror industry: a claustrophobic mummy, a zombie who questions the meaning of undeath, a possessed demon child who’d rather play with dolls and other incompetent monsters who stagger against the grain and find new truths in life on the dark side.

About the author
Jan Underwood was born in Pennsylvania, has lived in Canada, Mexico and France and now lives with her daughter in Portland, Oregon.  She teaches Spanish at a community college and writes, acts and fools around on the piano in her spare time. Day Shift Werewolf is her first novel.

2nd Prize ($500 Cash Award)
Skunks I Have Loved by Srividya Natarajan  (London, Ontario)

3rd Prize (Library of 3-Day Novels)
Basement Fishing  by Terry Dove   (Vancouver, British Columbia)

Shortlisted Authors (literary prizes for each)

Emily Anderson and Zach Scott, Chicago, Illinois
Manuel Azuaje, Edmonton, Alberta
Elizabeth Bachinsky and Amber Dawn, Maple Ridge/Vancouver, British Columbia
Matthew Claxton, Langley, British Columbia
James Dallas Smith and Adam Sikora, Oshawa, Ontario
Jessica Darago, Arlington, Virginia
Eric Howerton, Nashville, Tennessee
Nicolas Milligan, Hinton, Alberta
Patricia Morningstar, Falls Church, Virginia
Griffith Owain, Toronto, Ontario
Jason Pearce, Richmond Hill, Ontario
Kristin Sumner, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Heather and Wes Wardell, Markham, Ontario
Robert Weston, Vancouver, British Columbia
Joe Wiebe, Vancouver, British Columbia

All of our 379 entrants deserve serious credit for stepping up to this challenge, and those who managed to complete and submit an entire novel should be very proud. Selecting a shortlist was a very difficult task for our judges, who had to compare many deserving books and weigh creativity, originality, technical skill, solid plots, neat characters, compelling phrasing, admirable risk- taking and good old-fashioned storytelling.

Best wishes in 2006 to all you writers. Good luck working on your novels or other drafts, and we hope you have a creative and productive year!

Regards,
Barbara Zatyko, Publisher
Melissa Edwards, Managing Editor

P.S. – The abebooks.com chatroom is still open for anyone who wants to talk to their fellow entrants. Visit www.3daynovel.com   and look in the upper right corner for the link.

P.P.S – Check out this review of Love Block, the winner of the 27th Annual 3-Day Novel Contest: http://www.bookslut.com/fiction/2005_12_007314.php

P.P.P.S—Check your mailboxes in the coming days for your token of completion and a special pre-registration offer for 3-Day 2006!

September 14, 2005

Three Days

Filed under: Books — rshangle @ 9:21 am

My good friend Eric and I participated in this three-day novel writing contest over Labor Day weekend.

holiday!

I would have posted about it sooner, but I’ve more or less just recovered from the rigor of the event.

that’s inaccurate, actually. i may never really recover, but the panic attacks due to post-contest lack of adrenaline/beer in my system have at least smoothed out to a predictable frequency of once per 18.5 hours. that newly low-low frequency may be due to the ativan, though.

At this point I can say the following: Eric and I created some write-based object (with the help of our friend mike, who brought us beers, food and ipod supplies)l the object was about 80 pages long, and we had sufficiently little shame (we have no shame, in fact!) to actually submit it to the contest.

Hey, the entry fee was $100! If you think we’re not going to ram our horrid, foetid offspring down their throat, or at least make _someone_ over there read it and feel our pain, you give us the credit normally attributed to human beings or any other “feeling” object. Inanimate carbon rod, for example.

Eric and I feel like we really created something. Much the same way, I’m sure, that the young child, at age 18 months or so, whenever a child becomes self-aware, feels the pride of creating feces, and must express the pride by flinging it at a wall, or whatever baby does.

Given the “strict” rules surrounding the contest, I can’t post any snippets of text, nor (I think) can I really tell you anything about the “plot” or “characters” contained within… well… I’ll risk this much and tell you the title:

Taketh

Writing a novel, much less one of any discernible quality, in just three days is quite a feat (I guess; this was my first try), and given the lack of preparation Eric and I put into this outing, I think the most apt analogy would be to two lard-asses who decide to enter the Boston Marathon, with no physical training, just to see how they do. You know, for fun.

Of course, said fatties would find out, in one or two kilometers, that it’s better to stop running, get re-acquainted with oxygen, and hit the bar. Or all the bars.

But is the analogy complete? Because, after all, one can drink during a three-day novel contest. There are other things one can do, too. Like watch episodes of Rome and Six Feet Under to decompress from the rigors of the last hours of sweating creation, and forget about the troubles in life for a while.

A runner could probably listen to INXS during the Boston Marathon, but you’d probably wind up dancing instead of, like, running to sweet, sweet victory.

The results come back in December. Let me predict them for you now:

1) We didn’t win.

2) We didn’t come in second.

3) If there is a booby prize for “Most Awful” (think: Pink Flamingos), we won’t win that either.

4) Booby prize for “Filthiest First Outing”… I dunno. It’s all right to dream.

If we’re lucky, our prize will be some sort of note back from the contest telling us that:

a) someone read our entry and

b) it was awful and

c) furthermore un-publishable in any venue, even Penthouse Forum but

d) get in shape, and pay us another $100 next year!

I look forward to engaging in battle again in 2006r. We’ll see how Eric feels about it.

rds

End note - Some Excellent Tunes We Listened To In The iPod of Our Mind During the Writing (2005):

Bob Mould
John Vanderslice
Fiery Furnaces
… and You WIll Know Us By the Trail of Dead
Ween
Motorhead
Coldplay (Eric didn’t like this so much)
Snow Patrol
Elliott Smith
The Hold Steady
Cat Power
Devo Awful web page.
Motley Crue

The Mars Volta
The Advantage
Destroyer

rufus wainwright
many others… and last but not least…
The mighty… mighty… White Stripes

and… Antony and the Johnsons… aka the sweet, sweet love-music of Jaime Gumb aka John Grant.

Which probably explains a thing or two regarding our subject matter.